Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxation Sales Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves wider county sales-tax option after amendment on local oversight fails
Summary
The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 94, expanding a county option sales tax for arts, zoos and recreation to include broader recreational and cultural uses. An amendment to give county commissions elective oversight of fund distributions failed after extended debate.
The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 94 on Feb. 9, 1996, expanding the counties' option to levy an additional one‑tenth of a cent sales tax to finance arts, zoological and recreational facilities and programs. The bill broadens eligible uses to include recreational, cultural, trails and similar activities and will require approval by a vote of the people in the affected county.
The most contested moment on the floor came when Senator Bolton introduced an amendment to require county legislative bodies to establish separate criteria for distribution and to allow county commissions to withhold distribution of funds. Bolton framed the change as adding "elective oversight" so that "the county commission would be able to hold the money" while preserving the statutory distribution percentages. He told colleagues the amendment did not change which organizations would receive funds but would make elected officials answerable if tax dollars were spent in ways the electorate found objectionable.
Opponents, including Senator Steele, argued the amendment risked nullifying the work and independence of the advisory boards created under the bill, saying it would, in effect, "ask why have the board if the commissioners ultimately are gonna be responsible for making all the decisions." Senator Polton and others questioned whether the amendment's language — which would permit a county legislative body to establish separate criteria and withhold distributions — was internally consistent with the bill's formula for distributions.
Senators raised specific distribution figures cited during debate: 12.5% to zoos, 35% to sports and recreation, and 52.5% to the arts. Critics warned that giving elected officials the power to hold funds could open the door to political pressure on programming choices; supporters called the amendment a reasonable accountability measure for publicly raised tax dollars.
After floor debate and questions from members, the Senate voted on Bolton's amendment; it failed. The Senate then voted to pass SB 94; the roll call recorded 27 aye votes, 1 nay and 1 absence. The bill will be transmitted to the House for consideration.
Senator Fulton, Senator Bolton and Senator Steele were among the principal floor participants during the amendment debate. The Senate made no further changes to the bill on the floor before passage and referred it to the House.
