Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances partial school‑fund equalization after fiscal-note wrangling

Utah State Senate · January 31, 1996
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 34, designed to partially equalize school funding through a five‑year phase-in and index a $24 guarantee to the WPU, passed the Utah Senate despite concerns that the bill's fiscal note could exhaust available uniform school fund fiscal‑note reserves. Vote: 24 ayes, 3 nays, 2 absent.

The Utah State Senate passed Senate Bill 34 on Jan. 31, a bill sponsors described as a partial equalization measure that would, over five years, increase the number of mills that the state guarantees and index that guarantee to the Weighted Pupil Unit (WPU).

Senator Craig Taylor, sponsor of the bill, said the legislation "is designed to bring about partial equalization in school funding," explaining that the measure would gradually raise the number of mills the state guarantees and tie the guaranteed $24 figure to the WPU so it does not lose real value over time. Taylor emphasized the bill does not fully equalize disparities between wealthy and poor districts but would ‘‘help to partially remedy that disparity.’’

Senator Peterson expressed a central fiscal concern: "The concern that I have is the tough one, the fiscal note...we have basically 5,000,000 of ongoing revenues out of the uniform school fund available to both house and senate," and warned that, if the fiscal-note estimate is correct, the bill could absorb the Senate’s portion of fiscal‑note funding and limit other education bills. Senator Taylor responded that he intended to take the bill to the Public Ed Appropriations Committee to seek reserved money to cover the fiscal note and asked colleagues for support.

After extended floor debate and questions about prioritization and fiscal impacts, the Senate called the question. The clerk recorded 24 ayes, 3 nays and 2 absent; the bill will be sent to the House for consideration.

What happens next: Sponsors plan to pursue funding options in appropriations committee work and the House will consider the bill under its calendar. Floor debate flagged the bill’s fiscal note as the main outstanding issue for implementation or prioritization.

Attribution: Floor quotes above are taken from remarks by Senator Craig Taylor and Senator Peterson during third‑reading debate.