Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Olympic Fund topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Debates Limits on Olympic Authority Spending; Substitute to Cap at $59 Million Advances
Summary
Lawmakers debated competing versions of legislation clarifying how revenues from the Olympic sales‑tax fund are held and returned; a substitute to cap Sports Authority spending at $59 million and require legislative approval to access amounts above that cap was moved and recorded after a division.
Senators took up competing proposals to clarify how revenues diverted for Utah's Olympic bid are managed and whether the Utah Sports Authority should face a legislative cap on spending.
Senator Marin described a bill that would clarify that revenues returned to the Olympic fund after obligations are repaid would be disbursed 50% to the general fund and 50% to cities and counties proportional to their sales‑tax contributions, and that contracts committing revenues above the $59,000,000 threshold must include repayment security.
Senator Montgomery offered a first‑substitute that would cap spending at $59,000,000 and require the Sports Authority to obtain legislative approval to access any funds beyond that cap, arguing the Legislature must retain oversight of tax revenue use. Montgomery said the substitute would continue the sales‑tax diversion through 1999 and allow the Legislature to appropriate additional funds if warranted.
Supporters of the authority's existing approach said the Sports Authority's business-oriented decision-making avoided regional political battles and had repaid $59,000,000 while planning a $40,000,000 endowment to operate facilities. Opponents argued a cap would reassure taxpayers and preserve legislative oversight.
The Senate debated loans, security for repayment and the potential for public criticism should spending exceed the voluntary $59,000,000 limit. A division was called on the substitute motion and the transcript records the motion as passing with the division recorded as '12 to 14' (as entered in the Senate proceedings); the substitute was then before the chamber for further scheduling and consideration.
Procedural housekeeping followed: senators coordinated committee scheduling and removed several 'circles' (postponements) from bills on the calendar in response to weather-related cancellations in the House and staffing constraints.
