Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Olympics Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate approves joint resolution clarifying state security interest in Olympic facilities after debate over repayment timing
Summary
After hours of debate and a Committee of the Whole hearing with the Salt Lake Organizing Committee’s fiscal representative, the Senate passed SJR 11 to clarify the state—s security interest in Olympic facilities and allow banks first lien positions on certain revenues; an amendment changing repayment dates was deferred to interim study.
The Utah Senate passed Senate Joint Resolution 11 on March 4, 1997, clarifying the state—s security interest in Olympic facilities and authorizing the organizing committee to seek bank financing with the lender in first position on specified contracted revenues. The chamber voted under suspension of the rules to send the measure to the House for further action.
Why it matters: The resolution affects how the state and the Salt Lake Organizing Committee structure repayment and collateral for the purchase and operation of Olympic venues. Its provisions were designed to make the organizing committee more creditworthy to lenders while protecting the state—s recorded interests in venues and equipment.
What happened: Sponsor Senator Marine explained the resolution—s core elements: it perfects the state—s security interest in $99,000,000 by first-priority deed of trust in the Winter Sports Park and establishes priority rules for up to $200,000,000 of requested bank credit. Senator Howe offered an amendment to move several state repayment dates (notably a $58,000,000 payment) from January into March so payments align with the organizing committee—s revenue stream. Howe argued the change would (1) help secure a line of credit for the organizing committee, (2) eliminate the need for a $1 million credit-insurance premium the committee might otherwise buy, and (3) allow the state to earn interest on delayed payments rather than a bank.
Opponents— concerns and technical testimony: Senators warned the amendment shifts risk to the state by delaying a substantial repayment and reduces pressure on the organizing committee to maintain disciplined cash flow. Several members recommended the specific timing-change be studied further. The Senate dissolved into a Committee of the Whole to hear detailed testimony from Gordon Crabtree, who described the organizing committee—s revenue timing (major TV receipts in March), existing insurance (about $150 million), current operating lines (approx. $25 million from local banks), and the committee—s negotiating position for up to $200 million in bank financing. Crabtree said if banks will not loan before revenues are received, the committee would need the state repayment schedule aligned with its revenue stream.
Resolution outcome and next steps: Senators ultimately approved the resolution but accepted a substitute motion to delay action on Senator Howe—s repayment-date amendment for one year and refer it to an interim study. The remainder of SJR 11 was advanced under suspension of the rules and returned to the House for further action. That course preserved the Senate—s clarifying language while reserving a fuller policy review of repayment timing and risk allocation.
Selected direct quotes from the floor: "2,000 registered voters, is all that would be required." — Senator Suazo (on a different measure earlier in the session). "If the bank is unwilling to loan us the money prior to the games, we will be required to come back to you and ask for this amendment to take place in the future." — Gordon Crabtree, Committee of the Whole testimony.
What—s next: The Senate returned SJR 11 to the House for concurrence on the final language; the suggested repayment-date amendment was referred to interim study, meaning lawmakers may re-evaluate the financial tradeoffs before approving a schedule that would change when the state receives major repayments.
