Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate backs bill allowing condo no‑smoking bylaws and nuisance claims for persistent smoke intrusion

Utah State Senate · February 24, 1997
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Second substitute SB49 would let condominium associations adopt no‑smoking bylaws, define persistent tobacco smoke drift as a nuisance, and permit injunctive relief and damages; sponsors plan technical amendments to clarify 'tobacco smoke' language and limits for temporary rentals.

The Senate debated a second substitute addressing secondhand smoke in condominium developments and related nuisance remedies. Sponsors said the bill narrowly targets condominium ownership and association authority to adopt rules restricting tobacco smoke that drifts into other units.

President Beatty explained the bill "has to do with secondhand smoking in condominiums, period," and sponsors walked the chamber through definitions, conditions that establish a nuisance (for example, recurring drift that creates health problems), and remedies including injunctions, abatement and potential recovery of damages and attorney fees for prevailing parties. The bill also distinguishes temporary rentals (e.g., vacation units rented for 30 days or fewer) and allows associations to adopt a smoking‑or‑nonsmoking designation in bylaws; if a buyer or tenant signs an agreement acknowledging drift into the unit, the bill limits later nuisance claims.

Floor discussion flagged specific technical edits: replacing the phrase "tobacco products" with "tobacco smoke," specifying standards for withholding deposits and clarifying when damages and attorney fees are recoverable. Senator Montgomery (former Health and Environment chair) summarized committee testimony saying construction or filtration changes are not practical for preventing drift, and that statutory remedies are necessary to protect health. The bill was ordered placed on the third reading calendar and later recorded 28 ayes, 1 absent for third reading placement.

Provenance: Bill text, floor discussion and vote recorded at SEG 1612–SEG 2031.