Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Food Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances sales-tax refund for donated food, adds certification requirement
Summary
The Senate approved an amendment requiring certification of eligible emergency food agencies and advanced a bill to refund sales-tax imputed on donated food; supporters say it stretches donated dollars for food banks, while critics say it effectively returns state dollars to private agencies.
Get email alerts on the Food Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate advanced legislation intended to ease the financial burden on food banks by refunding sales tax imputed on donated food, approving a certification amendment to limit eligibility to bona fide organizations.
Senator Stevenson, sponsor of Senate Bill 50, described the bill as a targeted refund intended to help food banks pay refrigeration, storage and operating costs: “This bill would provide for a refund of the sales taxes that is in that are imputed to have been paid on that donated food,” he said, and added an amendment to authorize the Division of Community Development to certify qualifying emergency food agencies.
Floor debate ranged from practical implementation to philosophical concerns about using state funds for voluntary agencies. A vocal opponent said the proposal was “automatic payment” of state dollars and argued donors should receive direct tax returns rather than the state routing funds back through agencies. “Once it hits the state, it belongs to the state,” the senator said in opposition, framing the bill as a policy choice about how taxpayers’ dollars are used.
Proponents argued the mechanism is parallel to existing refund processes for purchases made directly by nonprofit organizations, and that the change levels the playing field for donated goods. The Senate adopted the certification amendment and passed the bill to the third-reading calendar by roll call (26 aye, 3 nay).
If enacted, the measure would require administrative rules to certify providers and set up the refund mechanism within the Tax Commission’s existing refund processes.
Next steps include technical work by the Tax Commission and the Legislature’s appropriation and administrative staff to stand up a certification and refund process if the bill completes the legislative process.
