Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves plans-examiner bill after amendment, sets compliance rules and 1999 effective date
Summary
Senators passed Substitute Senate Bill 135 to require qualified/licensed plans examiners for larger buildings, adopt training standards tied to the Uniform Building Code, clarify exemptions for school districts, and adopt an amendment limiting imposed outside-service requirements; roll call recorded 23 ayes, 4 nays and 2 absentees.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 14, 1997, passed Substitute Senate Bill 135, updating the state’s oversight of building plan review by establishing minimum qualifications for plans examiners and setting a compliance framework for communities that choose to employ such examiners.
Senator Craig Peterson, who carried the bill, said the measure replaces an older 'protocol' model with a clearer delegated-services framework and requires communities that choose to use a plans examiner for larger buildings to ensure the examiner meets minimum qualifications set by the division in collaboration with the commission. The bill includes an effective date discussed on the floor: July 1, 1999.
Why it matters: Sponsors said the bill is intended to improve public-safety consistency by ensuring that plan reviewers meet uniform qualifications tied to the Uniform Building Code. Opponents cautioned that statewide minimums could reduce local flexibility and impose costs on smaller cities that must come into compliance.
Key provisions and clarifications raised on the floor: - The bill requires a licensed plans examiner for larger structures beginning July 1, 1999, unless a community opts not to have a plans examiner. - School districts were discussed as effectively exempt unless they hire a plans examiner, in which case minimum qualifications would apply. - The floor adopted an amendment clarifying that communities may use their own qualified staff rather than be compelled to contract with outside agencies.
Vote and procedural outcome: After debate and the adoption of the amendment, senators voted to pass Substitute Senate Bill 135; the roll-call was recorded in the transcript as 23 ayes, 4 nays and 2 absent. The bill will be sent to the House for its consideration.
Next steps: Implementation details (training, certifying exams, and how the division will administer minimum qualifications) were described on the record as matters for the division and the commission; the floor indicated funding would be handled from the department enterprise fund tied to existing permit fees. No additional fiscal appropriation was recorded on the floor.
