Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreation Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate narrows off‑highway vehicle dune language, adopts flag standard in SSB128
Summary
Substitute SB128, regulating off‑highway vehicle (OHV) operator requirements, was clarified on Feb. 12 to specify Coral Pink and Jericho dunes and to require eight‑foot safety flags; the amended bill passed the Senate with a recorded vote.
Get email alerts on the Recreation Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Substitute Senate Bill 128, introduced by Senator Holmgren and discussed on Feb. 12, addresses operator requirements for off‑highway vehicles (OHVs). Senators engaged in detailed floor discussion about which sand dune areas the bill should cover, noting Coral Pink Sand Dunes State Park and the federal Jericho dunes as prominent sites. Floor questions focused on whether the bill should limit application to state parks, federal lands, or a broader set of dune areas used by recreationists.
Senator Taylor asked how 'sand dunes' would be defined and whether the bill’s language would inadvertently omit popular dune areas; floor discussion acknowledged the possibility of other unofficial dunes used for recreation. The Senate adopted an amendment inserting "Coral Pink" and "Jericho" before the term "sand dunes" to clarify the principal sites under discussion. The bill also includes an operator safety requirement that flags on OHVs be at least 8 feet above the ground; senators debated whether that height reflected current practice and the stated intent of visibility and warning.
After floor amendments and discussion, the clerk announced a roll call and reported substitute SB128 passed by 28 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent. Sponsors said the intent is to coordinate OHV safety and operator rules across jurisdictions while recognizing the practical variety of dune areas in Utah.
Next steps: The amended substitute will be transmitted to the House for consideration. Lawmakers indicated staff and the bill sponsor would continue to clarify definitions and applicability between the chambers as needed.
