Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consumer Credit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate pauses consumer‑credit changes after debate over grace periods and late fees
Summary
Senators debated House Bill 235, which would eliminate Utah’s automatic 10‑day extension on top of typical credit‑card grace periods and raise certain fees to market levels. Concerns about consumer impact led the Senate to circle the bill for further consideration.
Floor debate on March 3 over House Bill 235 centered on changes to the state’s consumer‑credit code, including elimination of Utah’s automatic additional 10‑day extension to credit‑card payment grace periods and a discussion of late‑fee amounts.
Senator Peterson, presenting the bill, described the proposal and why the change was being considered. "What this does is takes eliminates that 10 day extension beyond the 25 days that you already have," he said, noting that existing contracts could supersede statutory defaults and that affected cardholders would have to be notified.
Other senators raised consumer‑protection concerns, asking whether the change would mean someone who mailed a payment on the contractual due date would be penalized and questioning the rationale for raising typical late fees to $35. Senators suggested intent language to indicate that providers should follow market pressures rather than jump immediately to the higher fee. After discussion, a motion to circle the bill (hold for further consideration) was approved.
No final passage is recorded in the provided transcript; senators directed further work and indicated interest in clarifying intent language and safeguards for consumers before the bill advances.
