Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hazardous Waste Fee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes third substitute for low‑level radioactive waste bill with $6/ton compromise

Utah State Senate (1998 Utah Legislature) · March 3, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extensive floor debate over acceptable per‑ton fees for low‑level radioactive waste, the Utah Senate passed the third substitute to Senate Bill 144 on March 3, 1998, sending the $6/ton compromise back to the House (25–3–1).

The Utah Senate on March 3 passed the third substitute of Senate Bill 144, a measure addressing the state's policy and fee structure for accepting low‑level radioactive and hazardous waste. The central point of floor debate was the per‑ton fee to charge for in‑state disposal.

Senator Blackcomb and supporters argued a lower, negotiable fee would secure House consideration and keep the measure alive: "Let's start out with $6," the sponsor urged, presenting the number as a tactical compromise to reopen discussions with the House. Other senators strongly objected to accepting a low $6/ton rate, arguing it undervalues land and public interest; Senator Maine said the state was "selling our land out" and urged a higher fee.

Floor negotiation focused on what level would attract House engagement without abandoning policy goals; supporters described the $6 figure as realistic and politically feasible. After debate and an unsuccessful amendment to raise the fee, the Senate adopted the third substitute and voted to return the bill to the House for further consideration. The clerk recorded 25 aye votes, 3 nay votes, and 1 absent.

The bill now returns to the House, where sponsors and appropriators will need to reconcile fee levels and any fiscal adjustments in the budget process. Proponents said the compromise permits continued negotiation; opponents warned the fee is insufficient to protect state lands and communities.

Next steps: The third substitute is transmitted to the House for further action and possible amendments; fiscal implications will be evaluated by budget committees if the House reopens the measure.