Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Eminent Domain topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate amends eminent-domain reform to cap initial appraisal costs and broaden protections for small owners

Utah State Senate · February 24, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

First Substitute Senate Bill 49 expands definitions and dispute-resolution options in eminent-domain cases, adding mediation/arbitration and changing appraisal-deposit rules; the Senate adopted an amendment requiring the condemning agency to pay the cost of the first additional appraisal before moving the bill to third reading.

First Substitute Senate Bill 49, presented Feb. 23, 1998, responds to concerns from seniors and small-property owners about eminent-domain takings. Sponsor Senator Suazo said the bill represents three years of work with stakeholders including the Utah Seniors Legislature, the League of Cities and Towns, the Department of Transportation and the governor's office.

Key provisions introduced on the floor include an expanded definition of 'agency' to encompass political subdivisions and public entities, a definition of 'small business' as one with gross annual income under $1,500,000, and a working definition of 'family farm' as operations of 1,200 acres or less. The bill authorizes property owners to submit disputes to mediation or arbitration and would change the deposit required from the condemning authority to an amount equal to the condemning authority's appraisal (up from 75% in earlier drafts).

Floor discussion focused on the definition of family farm, the potential for repeated appraisal demands and the cost to state agencies. Senator Jones expressed concern that the state could incur repeated appraisal expenses and proposed a cap; after discussion the Senate adopted a floor amendment to require the condemning agency to pay the cost of the first additional appraisal (inserting the word 'first' before 'additional appraisal' on page 4, line 15).

Supporters characterized the bill as a property-rights measure that protects small owners and family farms and provides mediation options short of protracted litigation; floor votes advanced the measure to third reading with two recorded nays and a small number of absences as read into the record on the floor.

Next steps: Sponsors said they would continue to refine the family-farm definition and consult with affected stakeholders before third reading.