Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Vacancies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate amends vacancy bill to empower parties to narrow nominees, keeps governor as appointing authority

Utah State Senate · February 27, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended debate, the Senate amended Substitute House Bill 77 to let parties use their usual nominating processes to narrow nominees to 1–3 names, but restored the governor as the official who makes the final appointment; the amended bill passed and will return to the House.

The Utah Senate on Feb. 26 approved changes to the process for filling midterm legislative vacancies, adopting a substitute that lets political parties use their usual delegate or nomination processes to narrow replacement candidates but preserving the governor’s authority to make the final appointment.

Senator Stevenson described the committee substitute as allowing parties to use "the same process" they use to nominate candidates in ordinary elections to narrow a field to two or even one nominee. "If we can trust the delegates to place people on the primary or general ballot, we should be able to trust them to narrow the field for appointment of replacements," Stevenson said.

Senators debated who should make the final appointment. Senator Wharton and others argued the governor traditionally respects party nominations and provides a neutral, statewide appointing official. Senator Bueller offered an amendment to reinsert the governor explicitly as the appointing authority, a change he said preserves party influence while keeping the appointment in a statewide office. That amendment passed on a recorded division and the Senate then adopted the bill as amended.

Senator Nielsen noted the House had passed the measure overwhelmingly and said letting delegates narrow a list responds to cases where a governor diverged from a party’s top choice. Senator Hall and other senators warned of potential intra-legislative politics if leadership were given appointment power instead of the governor.

The Senate’s final posture: the bill as amended permits parties to use their internal nominee/ delegate processes to submit one, two or three nominees to the appointing official; the amendment retained the governor as the official who will select among those nominees. The measure will return to the House for consideration of the Senate changes and could require a conference committee if the chambers do not concur.

What happens next: The House will receive the Senate amendment; if the House accepts it the bill proceeds to enrollment and signature. If the chambers disagree, leaders signaled a conference committee is possible.