Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education School Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects bill to allow voters to create new school districts; SB 13 fails on third reading
Summary
After extended floor debate about costs, equity and safeguards, the Utah Senate voted 9–19 on Feb. 23, 1998 to defeat SB 13, a bill that would have created a statutory petition process allowing voters in large districts to form new school districts.
The Utah State Senate on Feb. 23, 1998 rejected Senate Bill 13, a measure to create a statutory mechanism for voters to petition to form new school districts. The bill failed on a third-reading roll-call vote, 9 ayes to 19 nays with one senator absent.
Sponsor remarks and amendment: The bill’s sponsor said SB 13 would not itself create new districts but would add a mechanism to state law allowing petitions and elections to create districts where voters asked for them. The sponsor explained the bill’s key safeguards: a 50,000-population floor for qualifying districts, a requirement that petitions gather signatures equal to 15% of qualified electors in each school board-member subdistrict (an amendment the Senate adopted), and that any election would be held during a general election to encourage broad turnout. “This does not create a school district. I am creating a process,” the sponsor stated during floor remarks.
Supporters’ case: Senators favoring the bill said it would give local communities more control over education and that a demanding petition threshold and a required financial study by the State Office of Education would limit frivolous or narrowly targeted petitions. Senator Nielsen said the measure would let communities decide the size and identity of their districts and suggested consolidation of very small districts could be pursued alongside options to divide very large districts.
Opposition and fiscal concerns: Opponents warned the statutory process would likely produce expensive duplication of administrative services and could reduce services to students. Senator Wallops read a letter from the Granite School District superintendent outlining likely consequences if large districts were split: reduced student services (counseling and at-risk programs), increased classroom sizes, and higher taxes due to divided tax bases. The superintendent’s office provided a rough capital-expenditure estimate for building a new district administrative campus — cited on the floor as about $44,000,000 — to illustrate one category of up-front cost the Senate would face under a split scenario.
Equity, integration and procedural risks: Several senators also raised concerns that permissive division could reinforce economic or ethnic segregation in some areas, and that the bill could create repeated ballot initiatives that would cloud bond and planning decisions for existing districts. Opponents urged Congress and the State Board of Education to produce statewide guidelines on geographic and fiscal feasibility rather than relying on a permissive petition process.
Outcome and next steps: After extended debate and a roll-call vote, the Senate clerk announced the final tally: SB 13 — 9 aye, 19 nay, 1 absent; the bill failed to pass on third reading and will not advance. There was no formal amendment to resurrect the measure during this session; sponsors indicated they might revisit the idea later with additional fiscal or study data.
Votes at a glance: The official roll-call was read on the floor; the clerk’s announcement recorded 9 ayes and 19 nays with one absence, resulting in failure.
