Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nuclear Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances measures on nuclear waste: standards for high‑level storage and new tax on low‑level waste

Utah State Senate · February 24, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators moved forward a regulatory framework for high‑level nuclear waste (SB196) and a separate first‑substitute taxing low‑level radioactive waste (SB144); debate covered safety requirements, bonding and an added $6/ton tax on low‑level waste (amended from $6 to retain that level after a proposal for $15/ton).

The Senate debated and advanced multiple measures addressing nuclear and radioactive waste on Feb. 24, moving a high‑level waste regulation bill (SB196) and a revised low‑level waste tax (first substitute SB144) to third reading.

Senator Craig Peterson said SB196 would create a regulatory environment and conditions (including application fees, bonding and safety protocols) if high‑level waste were to be accepted in Utah. Opponents and supporters traded technical and fiscal concerns: Senator Holmgren warned of litigation and questioned safety and site selection; supporters said a strict regulatory framework and bonding requirements would protect residents. Sponsorship language cited constitutional and NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) considerations.

On radioactive waste taxation, Senator Blackham presented a first substitute that eliminates prior contents and instead imposes a $6 per‑ton tax on low‑level radioactive waste entering Utah (in addition to an existing $2.50), with an estimated revenue increase of approximately $1.4 million. Senator Taylor proposed raising the tax to $15 per ton; the Senate rejected the larger increase and retained the $6 figure to "test" the effect for a year. Senators also discussed the Atlas tailings remediation near Moab and whether the tax would affect those cleanup plans.

Both measures passed floor votes and were sent to the third‑reading calendar; sponsors said further fiscal and administrative details will be handled in subsequent steps.