Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adoption Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves amended adoption bill after debate over background checks and post‑placement evaluations
Summary
After extended floor debate, the Senate passed amendments to House Bill 59 that adjust criminal‑background-check timing for adoptive placements and allow judges discretion to waive post‑placement evaluations, advancing the bill to third reading (26 ayes, 3 nays as announced on the floor).
Get email alerts on the Adoption Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 17 advanced substitute House Bill 59, a package of adoption-law amendments, after extended debate over balancing child protections and reducing burdens on adoptive families.
Senator Paulton, carrying the bill for Representative Stevens, said the measure exempts step-parents and certain relatives from pre‑ and post‑placement evaluations while retaining a criminal‑history search and child‑abuse check for every adoptive placement. The bill also clarifies who may conduct adoptive evaluations and allows adoptive parents, in cooperation with the court, a right to seek a second opinion if an evaluation is disapproved.
Senator Taylor proposed restoring House committee language on two key points: allowing a criminal‑background check conducted within the prior 18 months to satisfy the requirement (expanded from 12 months), and giving the court discretion to waive a post‑placement evaluation upon petitioner request unless the court determines the evaluation is in the child’s best interest. Taylor characterized the change as a way to reduce unnecessary costs to adoptive parents while preserving judicial oversight.
Senator Murray and others opposed parts of the amendment, arguing that waiving post‑placement evaluations could allow problematic placements to proceed and that other states require such reviews. Murray said, "I oppose these amendments... they tell me that there have been times when they find that these are necessary, that adoptions are not the best thing to do." Supporters including Senator Taylor responded that judges take these matters seriously and the bill still permits courts to require evaluations when warranted.
The floor adopted the amendment restoring House provisions and the Senate then called the question. President Beatty announced the result on the record: House Bill 59 passed to the third‑reading calendar with 26 ayes and 3 nays as announced on the floor.
Why it matters: HB 59 changes the process for private and relative adoptions in Utah by reducing duplicative evaluation requirements for relatives, clarifying who may conduct evaluations, and giving judges explicit discretion to waive a post‑placement evaluation. Supporters said the changes will reduce cost and delay for adoptive families; opponents warned courts and lawmakers must preserve safeguards for children.
What comes next: The bill was placed on the third‑reading calendar and will return to the Senate for final floor action unless further amendments are made. If ultimately passed by both chambers it will amend adoption procedures and related court processes.
Source: Floor debate and roll‑call announcement on Feb. 17, 1998.
