Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances bill to strengthen affordable-housing planning, places measure on third‑reading table for fiscal review

Utah State Senate · February 12, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators advanced House Bill 210, which tightens affordable‑housing planning requirements and adds funding for county and city plans, but placed the bill on the third‑reading table because of a fiscal note and concerns about small jurisdictions.

Senators moved House Bill 210 to the third‑reading calendar and then placed it on the third‑reading table after debate about its fiscal implications and effects on very small towns.

Sponsor Senator Suazo said HB210 builds on 1996 affordable‑housing planning law by strengthening annual planning requirements and appropriating additional funding "so that these counties and cities may produce their plan on an annual basis." He told the Senate that the Department of Community and Economic Development had trained 27 of 29 counties and that the bill emerged unanimously from a legislative task force on regulatory barriers to affordable housing.

Several senators pressed for exemptions or amendments for sparsely populated localities. Senator Demetriuk said some rural counties have little capacity to develop plans, asking whether the roughly $280,000 discussed would be sufficient for very small communities. Suazo said he would consult the House sponsor and prepare amendments for third reading.

Senator Lintzak urged caution about structuring exemptions so that small communities do not use them to opt out of participating in statewide planning. Senator Swazell noted the department "avails itself to these smaller towns" and emphasized that funding and staff assistance accompany the requirement.

Because the bill carries a fiscal note, Senator McAllister moved to place HB210 on the third‑reading table so the fiscal issues can be resolved; the motion carried. Earlier roll call recorded the question to read HB210 for the third time at 24 aye and 2 nay votes.

What happens next: the bill remains on the third‑reading table pending resolution of its fiscal note and any sponsor amendments to address small‑jurisdiction concerns.