Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves ban on fusion candidacies after floor arguments
Summary
The Senate passed House Bill 75, which prohibits a candidate from appearing on more than one party’s ballot line, after supporters said fusion could be exploited for advertising and opponents warned it would marginalize third parties; the bill passed 16–12 and will be transmitted to the House.
Get email alerts on the Elections Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Montgomery described House Bill 75 as a measure to prevent "fusion" candidates from appearing on the ballot as nominees of more than one political party. The sponsor and backers said the bill is intended to keep ballots focused on candidate choice rather than party advertising.
Senator Maine spoke against the bill, invoking historical examples of fusion candidates (he cited Ronald Reagan’s cross-endorsements) and warned that banning fusion would further marginalize third parties and limit political experimentation. He argued that third parties can push major-party debate on issues like campaign finance and that the law should not foreclose those avenues.
Senator Jones and other supporters said candidates should be definite in their party affiliation and that the change would reduce confusion. After floor debate and a roll-call vote, the president announced that House Bill 75 passed with 16 yeas, 12 nays, and 1 absent; the bill was signed by the president in open session and referred back to the House for final signature and enrollment.
Next steps: With Senate passage recorded, HB 75 will return to the House for final enrollment. The floor record captures both the policy rationale of proponents and the dissenting view that the bill constrains minor-party influence.
