Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Circle Of Wellness topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances $500,000 for ‘Circle of Wellness’ urban Indian center after debate on oversight

Utah State Senate · February 9, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 44 would appropriate $500,000 toward a ‘Circle of Wellness’ urban Indian community and cultural center in Salt Lake County; sponsors said the Native community will raise $100,000 as a condition and the Division of Indian Affairs would be involved, while several senators asked for clearer administration and distribution plans before final passage.

Senate Bill 44, presented Feb. 9 on the Senate floor, would appropriate $500,000 from the state general fund for development of a community and cultural center dubbed the “Circle of Wellness.” Sponsor Senator Schwazow described the appropriation as part of a matched effort: the Native American community has committed to raise $100,000, producing a 5:1 match before state funds would be released.

Why it matters: The bill targets services and cultural space supporting Utah’s Native American population — the sponsor said roughly 32,000 Native Americans live in Utah, about 11,000 in Salt Lake County — and includes components such as tribal office space, services co-location, cultural exchange areas and space for Indian businesses. Supporters framed the project as both a resource for the Native community and an asset for the broader public and tourism during the 2002 Winter Olympics.

What proponents said: The sponsor summarized a feasibility study and the broad-based steering committee’s planning work. "This bill seeks to appropriate $500,000 to the circle of wellness," the sponsor told the chamber, noting prior state appropriations helped fund a feasibility study and that the facility would co-locate existing nonprofit services.

Questions from colleagues: Several senators expressed concern about mechanics and safeguards. Senator Tanner said he was not opposed to the project’s goals but wanted clearer checkpoints and stronger language on state oversight, asking how funds would be administered and whether the Division of Indian Affairs or other state structures would provide sufficient oversight to ensure the money is spent on the project elements described. The sponsor responded that funds would be under the auspices of the Division of Indian Affairs and that monies must be distributed prior to the year 2000 or they lapse; he agreed to meet with concerned senators and organization leaders before third reading to firm up oversight details.

Vote and next steps: The floor voted to advance SB44 to third reading (recorded advancement on Feb. 9). Sponsors and committee members pledged to supply clearer administration and distribution language and to reconcile any outstanding fiscal or oversight questions before final passage.

Implementation notes: The sponsor described the Division of Indian Affairs as the state entity to oversee distribution; the bill contains a use-by date for the funds and conditions tied to community fundraising. The Senate asked staff and sponsors to supply a more detailed administration plan prior to the bill’s return to the floor for final action.