Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sjr10 Vote topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah Senate approves substitute SJR 10 after debate over initiative repeat votes

Utah State Senate · February 4, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate voted 25–3, with one absence, to send substitute SJR 10 to the House on Feb. 4, 1998, after a floor exchange about whether repeated ballot initiatives can wear down voters and whether outside interests influence Utah campaigns.

The Utah Senate voted 25–3, with one senator absent, to pass substitute SJR 10 and send it to the House after a brief floor debate about citizen initiatives and campaign influence. The body put the substitute resolution to a roll-call vote following a motion to call the question.

The debate centered on whether repeated ballot initiatives can "wear down the electorate." An early floor speaker argued that initiatives that have failed previously gain an advantage when voters stop participating, proposing that "it has to pass as many times as it fails, or it has to pass by as high a percentage as it fails." The speaker said groups with money and focus can force multiple elections until a narrow margin produces passage.

Another senator cautioned against applying that principle to statutory changes, saying it could create "real problems" for bills that had been amended over time. That senator also told colleagues he had reviewed constituent emails and was concerned that many messages about the initiative had come from out of state, calling outside campaigning "a little concerning." A third senator pushed back on the out-of-state charge, saying the measure's support "comes from Utah" and identifying sportsmen, livestock and farming groups as local backers.

After debate ended, the Senate proceeded to a roll-call. Following the recorded vote, the presiding officer announced that substitute SJR 10 carried with 25 aye votes, 3 nay votes and 1 absence and that the substitute would be transmitted to the House.

No mover or seconder for the roll-call motion was recorded on the floor beyond the motion to call the question; the official tally was announced by the chair.