Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the SB35 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects amendment to SB35; approves recreation and tourism extension at Utah State
Summary
After floor debate over whether to assign a recreation and tourism outreach program to a specific university or leave assignment to the Board of Regents, the Senate rejected an amendment and approved SB35, sending it to the House (27–0).
Senate Bill 35, a measure to reestablish outreach work connected to the Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, passed the Utah Senate Feb. 2 after a contested floor amendment failed.
Sponsor and proponents: Senator Hilliard introduced SB35 as a way to restore outreach activities tied to university extension work and to prioritize funding later in the session. He said institutions including Southern Utah University and the University of Utah expressed support.
The amendment and debate: Senator Evans offered an amendment that would remove specific statutory designation of the program to a single university and instead give the State Board of Regents authority to assign the program to the appropriate university. Evans said making assignment a Board of Regents responsibility would preserve the normal prioritization process and avoid creating a statutory 'shield' that protected the program from budget scrutiny.
Opposition to the amendment came from Senator Hilliard (and other supporters of naming Utah State University), who argued the program has existed at Utah State since 1936 and that explicit statutory designation makes the program visible and accountable; he warned that leaving the funds to general Regents prioritization risked losing identifiable funding or accountability.
Outcome: The question was called, the amendment failed, and SB35 was read for final passage. The bill passed on roll call with 27 aye votes, 0 nay votes, and 2 absent and was sent to the House.
Why it matters: The vote resolves where statutory authority for the outreach program will sit, affecting oversight and potential budget protections. The dispute framed a broader tension legislators described between statutory entrenchment (which can shield programs in lean budgets) and centralized prioritization by the Board of Regents.
Next steps: SB35 will be transmitted to the House for consideration. Budgetary support and prioritization will be decided later in the session.
