Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Wildlife topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances resolution to raise ballot threshold for wildlife initiatives

Utah State Senate · February 3, 1998
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate adopted a first-substitute of SJR 10 to put on the ballot a proposal raising the public-petition threshold for wildlife-related constitutional changes to a two-thirds requirement; sponsor said the change is intended to protect existing wildlife-management procedures; the substitute passed and was advanced to third reading.

The Utah Senate on Feb. 3 adopted a first-substitute of Senate Joint Resolution 10, moving the measure to the third-reading calendar and clearing the way for a ballot question that would raise the public-petition threshold for wildlife-related constitutional changes to two-thirds.

Sponsor Senator Blackcomb said the change reflects the state’s established wildlife-rulemaking process — regional committees, a wildlife board and technical staff review — and would make it “much more difficult in the state of Utah to do an anti-hunting, anti-fishing type initiative.” He told colleagues the substitute incorporated all cosponsors who had signed on to the resolution.

Supporters argued the higher threshold will respect existing technical review and public-comment procedures conducted by regional committees and the wildlife board; opponents did not offer substantial floor debate and the substitute was adopted. The chair recorded 24 ayes, 1 nay and 4 absent on the motion to advance the substitute to third reading.

If approved by voters, the measure would change constitutional language governing how wildlife-related initiatives may be placed before the public. The Senate’s action Tuesday was procedural: adoption of a substitute and advancement to the third-reading calendar; no final ballot placement occurred during the session.

The resolution’s sponsor said staff will be available to answer follow-up questions as the item moves through the legislative process.