Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electronic Payroll topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves electronic-payroll measure after debate over employee choice
Summary
On Jan. 26, 1998, the Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 14 to broaden use of electronic payroll deposits, 16–8. Supporters said the measure modernizes payroll and reduces lost or stolen checks; opponents warned it could curtail some employees’ ability to receive paper paychecks and questioned whether employers could impose direct deposit.
The Utah Senate on Jan. 26 passed Senate Bill 14, a measure that expands the use of electronic payroll transfers, by a roll-call vote of 16–8 with five senators absent. Sponsors described the change as a step toward modernizing payroll practices and reducing lost or stolen checks; opponents said the bill risked removing a long-standing choice for some employees.
Supporters, including several senators who spoke in favor on the floor, framed the bill as an efficiency and security upgrade. “It protects 99% of the people’s monies,” a sponsor said during debate, arguing electronic transfers prevent checks from being lost or stolen. Senator Tanner said the measure “talks clearly to the direction that we’re going with electronic commerce” and said his accounting department had found direct deposit useful for employees (Sen. Tanner).
Opponents raised practical and fairness concerns for small businesses and for employees who lack bank accounts or prefer paper checks. Senator May summarized outreach with small employers and told colleagues, “They say this is for the big boys,” describing businesses she had contacted that did not use electronic transfer (Sen. May). Senators also asked whether the bill would allow an employer to force an employee onto direct deposit over the employee’s objection. Floor discussion showed disagreement about how the change would be implemented: some senators said the bill and the existing wage statute would continue to preserve employee options, while others urged clearer protections for employees.
Floor debate addressed bank practices and immediate availability of direct-deposited funds. Sponsors responded that a direct deposit is confirmed funds and, in their view, cannot be treated as uncollected funds subject to a withholding delay.
The Senate adopted the bill on a roll-call; the clerk recorded the vote and the bill will be transmitted to the House for consideration.
Next steps: SB 14 moves to the House for its consideration and any amendments there could change how (and whether) employers and employees are affected in practice.
