Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances wildlife, procurement and funding measures; votes at a glance
Summary
The Utah Senate moved multiple bills and resolutions forward, including two wildlife bills establishing notice and planning processes, a procurement modernization measure, a special revenue fund wording change, an Olympic housing resolution (amended to add 'accessible'), and a staff-compensation resolution.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate advanced several bills and resolutions on a range of policy and administrative topics and recorded roll-call outcomes for multiple measures.
Key items and outcomes
- Senate Bill 11 (Transplant for Wildlife): Sponsor Senator Marine described a stakeholder-driven bill that defines "sensitive species," requires public notification and input on transplants, and recognizes state-tribal agreements for certain reintroductions. A fiscal note read in the chamber set appropriations of $88,900 in 1998 and $88,900 in 1999. The Senate called the question and SB11 passed to the third-reading calendar with 24 aye votes, no nays and 5 absent.
- Senate Bill 12 (Management plans for Division of Wildlife Resources lands): Senator Marine said the bill requires notice when the division acquires lands and coordination with local governments and the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration; fiscal note cited approximately $11,500 per year for two years (publication and travel). By roll call SB12 passed to the third-reading calendar with 24 ayes, 1 nay and 4 absent.
- Senate Bill 83 (Division of Purchasing amendments): Senator Evans said SB83 allows the Division of Purchasing to move from a central physical store model to an electronic catalog accessible online, and permits political subdivisions and school districts to access the system. The sponsor called the question and the bill passed through the third-reading calendar (roll-call details not specified in the transcript).
- Senate Bill 101 (Special revenue fund wording): Senator McAllister explained SB101 corrects accounting nomenclature by changing references to the Centennial Highway Fund so it is described as a special revenue fund (removing the word 'trust'); the bill passed through the third-reading calendar (roll-call details not specified in transcript).
- SJR 4 (Resolution supporting affordable and accessible Olympic housing): Senator Suazo introduced a resolution urging the Salt Lake organizing committee to include affordable and accessible housing in proposals for the 2002 Winter Games' housing legacy. Senator Suazo offered and the Senate adopted an amendment to insert the word "accessible" throughout the resolution. The resolution was read for the second time and moved to the third-reading calendar.
- SJR 8 (Compensation of in-session employees): Senator Montgomery outlined a five-step hourly schedule for session staff reflecting a 4% increase over last year. The measure was adopted by roll call (25 aye votes, no nays reported in the transcript).
Several procedural motions were also recorded, including unanimous agreement to suspend the rules to take up second-reading calendar items and to move into a committee of the whole to receive the Chief Justice's State of the Judiciary report.
Quotes
Senator Marine on stakeholder engagement for the wildlife bills: "We pulled a group of people together... the Ute Indian scribe was involved, the Sierra Club was involved, the mining association, farm bureau... the sportsmen... and the wildlife federation."
Senator Pearson raised definitional concerns: "One of the concerns that I have... is really getting a concrete understanding of their process of listing and the process of determining the various categorizations of sensitive species."
What happens next
Most measures were advanced to the third-reading calendar; those items will return for final action in a later floor session. Several fiscal notes and impact details were read into the record; where final roll-call tallies are not recorded in the transcript the outcome is listed as "passed" or the vote details are noted as "not specified."
