Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Minimum School Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate recedes from amendments to House Bill 3 after debate over school funding changes
Summary
The Utah State Senate voted to recede from its amendments to House Bill 3, the Minimum School Program Act changes, after extended debate about moving line items into weighted pupil units and assurances from leadership that education funding was fully appropriated for the year.
The Utah State Senate on March 2, 1999 voted to recede from Senate amendments to House Bill 3, the Minimum School Program Act, after extended floor debate about the bill’s intent language and local control of school funding.
Senator Stevenson, who led the discussion of the conference process, said the Senate had inserted language directing the State Board of Education to work with interim committees to study consolidation or elimination of line items and that the House asked the Senate to recede from that change. "We have appropriated everything possible this year. We have not held anything back in education funding," Stevenson told colleagues while urging a procedural resolution and a final vote.
Opponents framed the recede vote as a substantive concern for educators. Senator Holt (identified in debate as opposing the recede) said the change sent "another message out there to make them question...where's when the door decide was decided," and predicted she would vote against final passage. Stevenson responded that the movement of funds into the weighted pupil unit had been prompted by the education community and not intended as a legislative attack on teachers.
After discussion the Senate moved, and carried, a motion to recede from its amendments. A roll-call on final passage followed and the clerk recorded the tally; the President announced the bill would be signed in open session and referred back to the House for final signatures and enrollment.
The floor exchanges mixed procedural points about conference committees with policy arguments about whether reallocating line items to locally controlled weighted pupil units improves efficiency or undermines protections for dedicated education line items. Several senators expressed a desire for clearer public discussion of budget choices and more openness in the executive appropriations process.
Next steps: Because the Senate receded from its amendments, the bill returns to the House and may be the subject of a conference committee or further adjustments between the chambers before final enactment.
