Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Heritage Sites Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate pauses House Bill on Native American remains over $500 damage threshold concerns
Summary
Senators questioned whether House Bill 192, which raises penalties for damage to archaeological sites, could criminalize accidental discoveries by setting a $500 damage threshold; lawmakers sought clarification from the state archaeologist and briefly moved to hold the bill.
The Utah State Senate on Feb. 11 considered House Bill 192, a proposal to raise the penalty for causing more than $500 in damage to an archaeological site to a third-degree felony, but senators delayed decisive action while seeking clarification from state archaeological staff about how the $500 threshold would be calculated and whether the measure could unintentionally criminalize accidental discoveries.
Senator Suazo, who carried HB192 in the Senate, said the bill follows federal law and that the $500 threshold "is basically determined by the cost to restore that site or the cost that it would . . . be assessed for an archaeological person to restore that site." The statement framed the bill s anchored to restoration costs rather than an abstract number.
Several senators raised objections, saying the bill as written might penalize well-intentioned homeowners or contractors who accidentally uncover artifacts during permitted work. One senator warned the penalty could create an incentive to hide discoveries: if accidentally uncovering artifacts could trigger fines or felony exposure, people might be less likely to report finds. That line of concern prompted the Senate to request input from state archaeological staff before proceeding.
Kevin Jones, identified in the transcript as the state archaeologist, was asked to clarify whether discovery during authorized excavation or with landowner permission would be treated as criminal under the bill. A response attributed to state archaeological staff in the discussion said the conduct "would only be a crime if the digging was done without the permission of the landowner, they knowingly and willingly did that dig." The exchange sought to separate intentional vandalism from inadvertent discovery during ordinary construction or agricultural activity.
On the floor the Senate moved to "circle" (temporarily hold) HB192 to secure the requested detailed guidance; an initial motion to circle was put to a standing vote and the chair ruled that motion failed. Later, senators reoffered a motion to circle and asked to consult directly with Senator Hallowell and staff; the transcript ends with that renewed motion under consideration and the final disposition not specified in the record.
Beyond HB192, the Senate processed routine business: the journal for the 25th day was read with minor amendments and a motion was made to adopt the committee report; communications from the House transmitted several bills (including HB105, HB165 and HB255) for consideration, and the Human Services Committee reported that Senate Bill 5 had been deleted and returned as a first substitute with amendments and tabled to Rules.
Votes recorded on procedural motions in this transcript are noted in the legislative record as presented here; specific roll-call vote tallies on the motions discussed were not specified in the provided transcript. The Senate indicated it would obtain further technical guidance from archaeological staff and could revisit HB192 after those clarifications are supplied.
