Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management Elk Farming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves elk-farming bill after debate on disease, hunting and wildlife impacts
Summary
Senate Bill 45, allowing domesticated elk harvesting under regulated conditions, passed after lengthy floor debate that raised concerns about disease transmission to wild herds, migration disruption and whether hunting should be permitted on elk farms.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Senate on Feb. 10 approved Senate Bill 45, which addresses regulations for domesticated elk and authorizes certain harvesting practices, after extended debate over wildlife impacts, disease risk and the propriety of allowing hunting on elk farms.
Senator Montgomery and other supporters argued the industry is heavily regulated and that fencing, inspection and disease controls mitigate the major risks. "These animals are contained. They're worth a lot of money," Montgomery said in defense of the measure. Supporters said the legislation preserves an existing agricultural enterprise and clarifies permissible uses.
Opponents, including Senator Ed Allen and others, said the bill risks wildlife habitat loss, could interfere with migration routes and might harm Utah's broader wildlife and tourism image. "There is a real concern about spreading disease from the domesticated elk to our native elk herd, which could be devastating if an epidemic did occur," Senator Montgomery (speaking to concerns raised) acknowledged and opponents echoed concerns about hunting and the bill creating perceptions of privilege.
The bill generated substantial public-safety and cultural complaints in floor debate: some described it as an "elitist" measure that could damage Utah's outdoor-image and hunting traditions, while others said prior agreements that excluded hunting from elk farming were renegotiated and that current operators invested significant capital expecting to manage their herds.
After debate and a call of the Senate, the roll call resulted in 19 ayes and 10 nays with no absences; the bill will be transmitted to the House for further consideration.
What happens next: SB 45 will be sent to the House for consideration; any House amendments could alter the law's scope, hunting provisions, or regulatory controls.
