Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debates shifting statewide elections off presidential years; proposal circled for further study

Utah Senate · February 11, 1999
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators debated HJR 4, a proposed constitutional amendment to shift statewide elections off the presidential cycle by enacting a single two‑year term in 2004 before returning to four‑year terms. Lawmakers raised turnout, fiscal and county‑election balance concerns and moved to 'circle' the resolution for further study.

Senator John L. Valentine presented HJR 4 on Feb. 11, proposing a one‑time two‑year term in 2004 to move governor and other statewide offices to an off‑year election cycle and thereafter resume four‑year terms.

Valentine said the change would make statewide offices "the focus of the election" rather than being overshadowed by presidential contests. He explained the measure would require 20 votes in the Senate to place the amendment on the ballot and highlighted a potential timing benefit tied to term‑limit transitions.

Opponents raised turnout and administrative concerns. "The percentage of turnout isn't nearly as high as it is during the presidential elections," said Senator Michael Pearson, noting that "35% of the people in my district voted" in his recent race and warning that off‑year timing could reduce participation and alter the thresholds for ballot initiatives.

Senator Hilliard urged further study by the Constitutional Revision Commission, saying he would prefer more time to examine the measure and its implications before placing a constitutional amendment on the ballot. Other senators warned that shifting the cycle could concentrate many county and state races in a single year and produce an unbalanced election calendar without adjustments at the county level.

After extended floor discussion on turnout, fiscal timing and county election balance, the Senate moved to "circle" HJR 4 — effectively pausing immediate action so leadership and committees can study the fiscal and structural impacts before the proposal returns to the floor.

Next steps: HJR 4 was circled for further consideration and did not receive a final floor vote on Feb. 11.