Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Districts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects substitute to fast‑track school‑district division study and initiative pathway
Summary
A proposed second substitute for House Bill 22 that would reinstate a study of school size and add a public initiative pathway failed on the Senate floor 13–15; sponsors said the substitute narrows implementation and delays any action to Feb. 2004, while opponents warned of churning and added administrative costs.
The Utah Senate debated House Bill 22 on Feb. 28, 2000 before voting down a second substitute that would have reinstated a study on school district size and established a high‑threshold public initiative path for dividing districts. Sponsor Senator Peterson said the substitute restores Representative Cox’s original study and pushes any implementation to Feb. 2004 to allow the education interim committee to review the findings.
Senators on both sides questioned whether the measure would encourage "churning" — frequent public initiatives and boundary changes — and whether it would impose new administrative costs on districts. Opponents including Senator Wadham, Senator Hilliard and Senator Maine cited letters from school boards and district superintendents opposing the change, arguing the studies had already been done and the initiative option could be destabilizing.
Senator Peterson said the substitute places difficult thresholds on any initiative (requiring signatures from 10% of registered voters in each board member’s district, a state financial study, and a general‑election timing requirement) and that prior experience suggested some large districts operate more efficiently than others. Championing local choice, Senator Poulton and others argued parents should be able to pursue smaller districts if warranted.
On voice and recorded votes the Senate ultimately did not sustain the substitute: the second substitute obtained 13 yea votes and 15 nays (1 absent) and failed; the bill was returned to the House. Later the Senate voted to request the House return HB22 for further discussion, but an attempt to reverse the earlier action failed on a division vote (11–10).
