Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances bill to limit municipal decriminalization of traffic offenses
Summary
After extended floor debate over due process and revenue, the Utah Senate advanced Senate Bill 240 to third reading; the bill limits cities’ ability to decriminalize certain traffic offenses and creates a task force to study the practice, with Salt Lake and West Valley City agreeing to reimburse projected fiscal shortfalls.
Senate Bill 240, a measure addressing local decriminalization of traffic offenses, passed to third reading following floor discussion about public-safety and fiscal impacts.
Sponsor Senator Hilliard said the bill responds to initiatives in West Valley City and Salt Lake City that had converted some traffic offenses to civil administrative processes. He said the bill’s first and third sections would pause new decriminalization by other cities and establish a task force to study the policy and recommend standards for due process and limits. "The task force's charge is to look at this whole process," the sponsor said while explaining the bill’s purpose.
Debate focused on whether cities should be allowed to continue their local programs until July 1, 2002, and on which offenses should remain criminal (sponsors said DUI and reckless driving would stay in criminal court). Senators raised concerns about lost state revenue, with a committee estimate that the state could lose between $1 million and $2 million if the practices continued without reimbursement. The sponsor said West Valley City and Salt Lake City agreed to reimburse the state for projected revenue losses during the interim.
Senators asked about administrative fairness and the potential to trivialize offenses; a justice court judge had testified against the program in committee, the sponsor said. After calling the question, the Senate advanced SB 240 to third reading by roll call.
Next steps: SB 240 will proceed back to committee or amendment on third reading for precise limits and task-force composition, as senators requested clarification on which class-B misdemeanors may be excluded from civil handling.
