Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Family Law topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debates broad child‑support reforms; bill circled pending corrected amendments

Utah State Senate · February 15, 2000
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senator Hilliard presented extensive floor amendments to child‑support law—introducing the 'child support follows the child' principle, expanding recovery rights for stepparents and grandparents, extending limitations periods and adding procedural protections for garnishments. The bill was circled after floor copies lacked committee amendments.

Senate Bill 49 drew an extended floor presentation and substantial discussion on Feb. 14, 2000. Senator Hilliard outlined a package of changes he said were meant to modernize the state's child‑support framework and to reduce future taxpayer exposure when parents fail to provide support.

Key elements described by Hilliard include a principle that "child support follows the child" so existing guideline calculations remain attached to the child through custody changes; expanded recovery rights allowing stepparents and grandparents to collect in certain circumstances; an extension of the statute of limitations for support judgments to the later of eight years or four years after the child reaches majority; and new paperwork and oversight requirements to limit voluntary relinquishments of parental rights used to evade obligations.

Hilliard also described procedural protections for those subject to administrative garnishment: if a wage garnishment occurred before a timely administrative objection, the bill would permit a trial de novo in the district court and permit an affidavit process to pause garnishment pending resolution. He said committee amendments addressing attorney fee attachments and other matters had been adopted in committee, but those amendments were not reflected on the copies available on the floor.

Because the goldenrod/computer copies on the floor did not include two committee amendments Hilliard had referenced, senators moved to circle SB49 until corrected language could be distributed and reviewed. The motion to circle carried, and the bill was set aside for later floor consideration.

What happens next: the bill was circled for correction and return to the floor with complete, agreed‑upon amendment language; further action will depend on distribution of the accurate substitute or amendments and subsequent scheduling by leadership.