Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate Rejects Measure to Fix Basic School Tax Levy After Heated Debate
Summary
The Utah Senate rejected first substitute Senate Bill 17 on third reading after a lengthy floor debate over whether fixing the basic school tax levy would shore up education funding or amount to an automatic property-tax increase for homeowners. The bill failed 14–15.
Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate leaders on Wednesday debated and then rejected first substitute Senate Bill 17, a proposal to set a minimum basic school tax levy intended to stop what supporters described as a steady erosion of school funding.
Senator Jones, sponsor of the bill, framed it as a remedy to declining per‑pupil funding: “We can liken it to the sales tax … we spend $256 less than the lowest state in the union,” he said, arguing that keeping the levy at a fixed rate would restore hundreds of millions of dollars to the Uniform School Fund. Supporters said the change would prevent an annual ‘‘hemorrhaging’’ of school revenues and give districts more predictable funding.
Opponents countered that the proposal would function as an automatic property-tax increase and undermine the state’s truth‑in‑taxation process. Senator Spencer described the measure in stark terms: “this particular bill is an abomination,” warning that it could force long‑time homeowners on fixed incomes to sell their homes. Senator Mansell and others argued it could spark a Proposition‑13 style backlash if property taxes rose annually without local hearings.
The Senate also debated technical points raised by Senators Nielsen and Valentine, who urged the sponsor to include caps and budget‑accounting provisions to prevent windfalls and ensure legislative appropriation did not effectively neutralize the increase. Senator Suazo, speaking for supporters, reiterated the urgency on education: “we are in the embarrassing position of being last per pupil expenditure in the country.”
After extended debate the Senate called the question. The final roll call on first substitute Senate Bill 17 recorded 14 ayes and 15 nays; the bill failed and will not be sent to the House.
The vote leaves lawmakers without the change proponents sought, and sets up further discussion in the Legislature about alternative ways to increase school funding while protecting vulnerable homeowners. The Senate adjourned for the day and is scheduled to reconvene at 10 a.m. the following day.
