Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Task Force topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate refuses House position on education task force; conference committee named

Utah State Senate · February 28, 2001
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators debated whether nonlegislative education officials should have voting seats on a legislative task force reviewing mandates and an audit. After debate, the Senate refused to recede from its amendments and appointed a conference committee to negotiate with the House.

The Utah Senate spent much of its morning session in a heated debate over who should have voting authority on a new public education task force created to review legislative mandates and a State Office of Education audit. Senator Poulton moved that the Senate recede from its own amendments and accept the House position removing nonlegislative voting members; senators opposed that change, arguing it would exclude the perspectives of locally elected school board members and the State Board of Education.

Supporters of the House position contended a purely legislative task force is the proper mechanism for reviewing mandates and that voting authority should remain with elected legislators. Senator Poulton argued the House amendment “would eliminate any voting members other than legislators on this legislative task force,” positioning the change as a preservation of legislative prerogative.

Opponents, including senators who served on earlier accountability task forces, said removing voting roles for board members reduced buy‑in and practical benefit. Senator Steele argued the earlier Standards and Accountability task force had succeeded because local and state board members were active voting participants and “their input and the vote… added to the effectiveness of that task force.” Other senators emphasized tradition and committee practice, with proponents of the legislative‑only approach noting that interim and standing committees typically include only legislators among voting membership.

On a roll call the motion to recede from the Senate amendments failed. Following that result, the Senate appointed a conference committee to meet with House members; Senators Poulton, Spencer and Julander were named to that committee to work out the differences between the chambers’ versions of the bill.

The Senate’s action preserves its amendments for now and sends negotiators to Capitol Hill’s next step: a formal conference with the House to resolve membership and voting language. The conference committee will report back to both chambers with recommended compromise language or a corrected conference report.