Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate fails to pass reconsidered child-discipline bill after heated floor debate
Summary
The Utah Senate declined to pass First Substitute House Bill 387 after senators debated its implications for Department of Child and Family Services oversight and whether the measure would send a message condoning corporal punishment. The motion to reconsider and move the bill for final passage was defeated on a roll call.
The Utah State Senate on Feb. 26, 2001, declined to approve First Substitute House Bill 387 after a contentious floor exchange over the bill’s substance and its administrative consequences.
Senator Wright (Senator Wright) moved for final passage of the bill after the body voted to recall it and place it at the top of the third-reading calendar. Senators agreed to suspend rules to allow a motion to reconsider. The sponsor pressed for a roll-call vote to decide passage.
Opponents, led in floor remarks by Senator Allen (Senator Allen), argued the bill risked sending the wrong signal about acceptable child-discipline practices in Utah and potentially created new administrative burdens for the Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS). “I’m very concerned about the message that we may be sending to those in Utah that spanking may be one of the preferred ways of disciplining children,” Senator Allen said on the floor, and he urged colleagues to vote against the measure, saying DCFS rules already contained critical provisions that the bill’s sponsors had cited.
After debate, the Senate held a roll-call on first substitute House Bill 387. The presiding officer announced the motion failed on the roll call, and the measure will be returned to staff for further action. (The legislative transcript reports more senators opposed than supported the motion to pass.)
The action followed a procedural back-and-forth over whether earlier floor action to recall the bill had included the formal motion to reconsider, and whether the reconsideration required suspension of the chamber’s rules because the session is beyond certain procedural deadlines. Senators explicitly put the motion to reconsider under suspension of the rules before proceeding to final passage.
The Senate’s refusal to pass the bill at floor vote leaves the measure subject to further work or withdrawal in committee; sponsors indicated they had discussed the bill earlier in the day and relied on the chamber’s procedural steps to bring it forward for a final decision.
Next steps: Because the measure failed on the Senate floor, lawmakers did not adopt the proposed changes to the code in this session; any future effort would require reintroduction or conference-level negotiation if the House acts separately.
