Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parental Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate amends parental-discipline language in House Bill 387 after intense floor debate
Summary
After heated debate over language exempting 'reasonable discipline' from abuse definitions, the Senate adopted a package of amendments to House Bill 387 addressing parental discipline and investigative scope; the package passed on roll-call and the bill was later recalled for reconsideration under a motion on the floor.
The Utah Senate spent substantial floor time on amendments to House Bill 387, a bill that addresses parental discipline, the scope of investigations by child-welfare workers, and related definitions.
Senator Butters offered three amendments intended to clarify that reasonable parental discipline remains protected while preserving the ability of Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS) investigators to pursue allegations that rise to abuse. Butters said the amendments were not intended to endorse physical abuse and repeatedly stated the bill does not authorize shaking or abusing infants; he described the changes as protecting parental rights and preventing overreach by government.
Senator Steele opposed removal of explicit language that previously excluded "hitting, striking, or shaking" from the statutory definition of reasonable discipline for children under 36 months. Steele urged retaining the protections for infants and said he feared the amendment could be interpreted as permitting harmful acts. Senator Spencer warned that inserting an affirmative defense could shift the burden of proof from the agency to the parent. Senator Butters and other supporters countered that the existing code and specific assault prohibitions would still criminalize violent acts such as shaking an infant, and that the amendments merely preserve reasonable discretion for parents.
The Senate placed all three of Butters' amendments on the bill at once and recorded a roll-call result of 15 ayes to 12 nays on those amendments. Later, a final floor passage vote was recorded as tightly divided (transcript shows a final first-substitute tally of 13 ayes, 14 nays) and the bill was returned to staff for filing. Following that result, a senator moved under suspension of the rules to recall House Bill 387 for reconsideration; after a division vote, the recall motion passed (division counted in the transcript as 14–10), and the Senate planned to reconsider the measure.
What happens next: Because a recall for reconsideration passed, the bill may return to the floor at a later point for another vote or conference with the House. The controversy centers on how statutory language balances parental authority and protections for infants and very young children; advocates on both sides signaled readiness to press their positions in subsequent proceedings.
Sources: floor debate and roll-call on Feb. 23, 2001, Senate session (House Bill 387 and amendments).
