Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Disclosure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate votes down bill that would remove ethics exemption for golf professionals
Summary
Senators debated and ultimately defeated HB 292, which would have removed a long-standing ethics exemption for municipal/county golf professionals; floor debate emphasized potential harm to rural course operations and concerns about fairness vs. disclosure requirements.
Get email alerts on the Ethics Disclosure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Bill 292, which would have reversed a decades-old exemption that limited application of the Public Employees Ethics Act to municipal or county-employed golf professionals, failed on the Senate floor Feb. 21 after extended debate about rural impacts and disclosure requirements.
Sponsor Rep. Holdaway (carried in the Senate by Sen. Spencer) said the bill would eliminate a special status previously granted to golf professionals and require reporting of concession income, explaining the change was prompted by questions about constitutionality (SEG 999–1006). Opponents noted the exemption affects roughly 60 golf professionals and said in many rural communities those positions depend on concession and lesson income to be economically viable. One senator warned the bill ‘‘would be a bad piece of legislation’’ for rural courses and could harm local management (SEG 1024–1031).
Supporters of disclosure framed the bill as an ethics issue: the proposal would not prohibit operations like renting carts or running lessons but would require those revenues to be reported to provide transparency (SEG 1096–1100). On final roll-call the clerk recorded the bill as receiving 4 aye votes and 21 nay votes (with 4 absent in one tally), and the presiding officer said the bill died and would be returned to the House (SEG 1176–1185).
Next steps: the bill failed on the floor and will be returned to the House. Floor debate suggested authors and interested senators may refine language to preserve transparency while addressing rural-course economic concerns.
