Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Tax Incentive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves five-year sales-tax exemption for semiconductor consumables tied to Micron jobs pledge
Summary
The Utah Senate passed first substitute SB 174 to create a phased sales-and-use tax exemption for consumables used in semiconductor fabrication, contingent on industry benchmarks and annual legislative review; sponsor said Micron’s workforce commitment is a central benchmark (bill referred to the House).
The Utah Senate on Feb. 21 approved first substitute Senate Bill 174, creating a time-limited sales-and-use tax exemption for certain consumables used in semiconductor fabrication that the sponsor said is contingent on industry performance and employment benchmarks.
Sponsor Sen. Bramble said the measure would phase in the exemption and require annual review by the Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee so the Legislature can evaluate ‘‘the cost of the exemption, the purpose and effectiveness of the exemption, and the benefits of the exemption to the state.’’ He told colleagues the measure includes a five-year sunset if benchmarks are not met and that intent language would be spread on the Senate journal to clarify the Legislature’s expectations (SEG 175–205; SEG 411–415).
Bramble and supporters framed the exemption as a targeted economic development tool for an industry with few in-state firms. Bramble said the bill’s benchmark reflects a commitment from Micron: ‘‘Micron originally projected that they would have 3,000 employees operating out of the Lehi plant’’ and the accepted benchmark in the intent language is ‘‘4,500 employees, a 1,500 employee addition’’ (SEG 264–271; SEG 405–408). He said the annual review and the ability to request exemption totals from the State Tax Commission are intended to provide oversight and to confirm the incentive’s effectiveness.
Sen. Allen and other senators who spoke in favor described the bill as narrowly tailored and offering the state a way to measure results before fully committing to long-term revenue impacts (SEG 216–224). After floor debate, the Senate conducted a roll-call vote; the clerk announced the bill ‘‘having received 23 aye votes, no nay votes, and 16 absent’’ and reported it will be referred to the House (SEG 375–377).
The Senate also accepted sponsor Bramble’s motion to spread intent language on the journal specifying that the Legislature’s willingness to forgo sales-and-use tax revenue is ‘‘contingent on the business meeting the benchmark ... of employing … at least 50% more employees than the original projections,’’ and that the Revenue & Taxation Interim Committee will review the exemption annually (SEG 386–415).
Next steps: the bill will be transmitted to the Utah House of Representatives for further consideration. The sponsor said the annual review mechanism will return data to the Legislature for future action.
