Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Vehicle Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate backs school-vehicle safety standards for small vans, sets delayed compliance date
Summary
House Bill 85, extending school-transport safety standards to vans with 11 or fewer passengers, advanced after debate on costs, scope (K–12 vs. higher ed) and effective date; sponsor set an effective date of Feb. 2003 for compliance.
Get email alerts on the School Vehicle Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 15 endorsed House Bill 85 to extend school-transportation safety requirements to smaller vans that carry up to 11 passengers, saying those vehicles lack the same crash-protection features as full-size school buses.
Sponsor Senator Steele described committee testimony that the small vans used for school trips are "just a sheet of metal" lacking side protection, and cited committee estimates that retrofitting or upgrading vehicles could increase costs by roughly $8,000–$9,000 per vehicle. The bill language limits application to school-operated vehicles (public and private K–12) and does not immediately require upgrades; the sponsor set a compliance expectation of Feb. 2003 to allow purchase cycles to adjust.
Opponents questioned whether the Legislature should micromanage local districts’ vehicle purchases and raised concerns about higher-education fleets that the bill does not cover. Senator Hickman asked the sponsor to consider broader higher-education implications in the future.
After debate the Senate called the question for third reading and recorded a floor tally of 19 ayes, 8 no votes and 2 absentees; the bill passed to the third-reading calendar.
Quote from the floor: "If you're going to utilize transportation of students of 11 or less, minivan category, then these minivans ought to meet the same standards of safe student transportation," Senator Steele said.
The bill’s fiscal note and implementation costs were discussed on the floor; sponsors said districts would not be required to upgrade existing vehicles immediately but would need to meet the standard over time as vehicles are replaced or purchased.
