Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workers Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate floor examines House Bill 59 on Workers' Compensation Fund oversight and outside activities
Summary
House Bill 59 would exempt the Workers' Compensation Fund from the open‑meetings law and allow it to form wholly owned, taxable subsidiaries to diversify and operate outside Utah; supporters cited portfolio diversification while opponents raised competition and taxation concerns and asked for amendments.
House Bill 59 drew extended floor debate over two linked questions: whether the Workers' Compensation Fund (WCF) should be exempt from the state open‑meetings law, and whether WCF should be allowed to form wholly owned subsidiaries to expand business outside Utah.
Sponsor Senator Valentine said the change resolves a legal question about whether WCF is a state agency and argued the Supreme Court has concluded fund assets are owned by policyholders rather than the state, which supports exempting certain WCF deliberations from the Open and Public Meetings Act. The bill also would let WCF create subsidiaries that would be fully taxable to expand and diversify its portfolio.
Opponents, including Senator Blackcomb, said they had "some real concerns with this bill," arguing that allowing a quasi‑governmental fund built by Utah employers to compete in open insurance markets raises fairness and competition issues — especially if subsidiaries are incorporated in low‑tax states. Blackcomb said he could support removing the open‑meeting portion but wanted more discussion about market competition. Senators asked staff to provide additional draft language and fiscal clarifications; a residual‑market figure of about $8.6 million was read into the record as context for the fund's recent costs.
Senators ultimately circled the bill to allow sponsors time to prepare amendments and to resolve fiscal and drafting questions before returning it for final action.
