Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate narrows impact-fee loophole; extends rules to private water companies
Summary
The Senate passed amendments to the Impact Fees Act to require private water companies that compel connections to follow the same impact-fee calculations as public providers, prompting debate about regulatory reach and fairness for developers and small private systems.
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Third-substitute House Bill 184, intended to bring private water companies that require mandatory hookups under the state’s Impact Fees Act, passed the Senate after debate about whether the change was a necessary closure of a loophole or an overreach targeting specific private providers.
Senator Bramble, sponsor of the Senate action, said the change prevents a situation in which a private water company could charge arbitrary impact fees because properties have no practical alternative provider. "What this bill does then is provides an equitable mechanism to compute the impact fees the same as any other citizen would be required to have their impact fees computed across the board," he said.
Opponents including Senator Jenkins said the bill appeared to be aimed at a particular water district and warned it imposes municipal-style regulation on private companies; supporters countered that basic utility delivery merits consistent treatment whether provided by a public or private entity. Senator Valentine said failing to pass the bill would leave a large loophole that allows private providers to escape standard impact-fee rules.
After discussion and a roll-call vote, the Senate passed the third substitute of HB184 (18 aye, 5 no). The bill will go back to the House for further consideration since it was amended in the Senate.
