Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Payment Protections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate Fails Prompt-Pay Measure After Heated Debate Over Contractor Protections
Summary
After two years of interim study and extensive floor debate, the Senate rejected the third substitute of SB19 — the Construction Prompt Pay Act — which would have set default payment terms and new remedies for subcontractors. The measure failed 14–11 in a roll-call vote.
A bill meant to establish default payment schedules and greater protections for subcontractors failed on the Senate floor Feb. 27, 2002, after an often-contentious debate over whether the state should mandate private contracting terms.
Senator Wadduff, sponsor of the third substitute for Senate Bill 19, described the measure as a response to repeated late payments that put small subcontractors at financial risk. The bill would have required bid documents to state payment terms, created default payment timelines if none were specified, and allowed subcontractors limited remedies — including the ability in some cases to suspend work if unpaid.
Supporters said the bill protected small, local businesses and workers who are frequently left unpaid when large general contractors hold funds. "Small business is the backbone of our industry," the sponsor said on the floor, urging senators to protect workers and subcontractors from abusive payment practices.
Opponents — speaking for builders’ associations and some county representatives — warned the bill would effectively let the legislature set contract terms for private parties and could harm the competitiveness of local construction markets. Senators who opposed the measure argued it would mandate terms and interfere with private contracting.
Following extended debate and multiple floor speeches on both sides, the Senate voted on the third substitute. The motion failed, 14 ayes to 11 nays with 4 senators absent; the chair announced the bill did not pass.
The failure returns the measure to staff and proponents said they would consider further work with stakeholders in interim study to address the industry’s concerns.
