Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Prompt Payment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate debate centers on Prompt Payment bill to protect subcontractors
Summary
Senate sponsors advanced SB 19, the Utah Construction Contracts Prompt Payment Act, aiming to create default progress-payment rules to protect subcontractors on projects exceeding 45 days; sponsor said technical changes remain and amendments were promised before third reading.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Senate spent significant floor time Jan. 23 debating Senate Bill 19, the Utah Construction Contracts Prompt Payment Act, a measure the sponsor described as a fallback to protect subcontractors when payment terms are not written into construction contracts. Sponsor Senator Wadobs told colleagues the bill was "a good bill" born of years of work and aimed at an "egregious problem" of subcontractors being left unpaid when general contractors delay or withhold progress payments.
Supporters — including subcontractors and legislators who said they regularly hear about firms forced into bankruptcy by unpaid invoices — urged passage with technical amendments. "When those payments don't flow, life's very good. And it's amazing how many subcontractors get held up in this squash of cash flow," Sen. Jenkins said in floor remarks describing the downstream impact on suppliers and small firms.
The bill sets default progress-payment rules for construction contracts whose performance periods "exceed 45 calendar days," sponsor remarks said, and reflected negotiation between subcontractor and general-contractor counsel. The sponsor acknowledged outstanding concerns from general contractors and said negotiators had resolved eight of about 10 disputed items but that three technical issues — including treatment of "pay-if-paid" clauses — remained unresolved. He said amendments addressing those points were expected to be filed before the measure is taken off third reading.
Lawmakers questioned whether the proposed rules would affect small homeowner projects. The sponsor said the bill is aimed primarily at larger commercial projects where long progress-payment schedules create cash-flow problems for subcontractors and suppliers; the statute includes an exception for disputed work and a performance-period threshold to avoid sweeping into short residential jobs.
Sen. Wadobs moved that SB 19 be read for the second time and passed to third reading with amendments to be offered; the motion to move the bill was made on the floor and the sponsor said he would present the amendments promptly.
