Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves consensus EMS bill giving counties alternate path to choose ambulance providers
Summary
After months of negotiation among Gold Cross, firefighters, counties and cities, the Senate passed a compromise (second-substitute SB180) allowing first- and second-class counties and cities to run a competitive RFP process to select ambulance/paramedic providers while preserving state certification and a state review/appeal mechanism.
The Utah Senate passed second‑substitute Senate Bill 180 on third reading after senators said they had secured a negotiated compromise between local governments, fire‑based responders and private ambulance providers.
Sponsor Senator Bramble said the measure preserves state oversight through the Bureau of Emergency Medical Services while creating a second path for local authorities in first‑ and second‑class counties to request an RFP and select a certified provider for ambulance and paramedic services. Under the bill, local elected officials may select a provider after a competitive process; the selection is then submitted to the state bureau to issue an exclusive license for the geographic area. The bill includes an appeal process for unsuccessful applicants and permits a local elected body to extend a satisfactory contract once for a second four‑year term (eight years total) without re‑advertising.
Senators who spoke during floor debate described extensive negotiations involving Gold Cross representatives, county officials and firefighters’ representatives. Supporters said the legislation increases local accountability and allows competition while keeping minimum state standards. The Senate recorded 27 ayes and 0 nays on third reading; the bill will be forwarded to the House for further action.
Speakers and participants included Senator Bramble (sponsor), Jared Miles and Mike Moffat of Gold Cross (attendees in the chamber), Alan Dayton (Salt Lake County), and representatives of firefighters who participated in negotiations. The bill affects emergency service contracting processes in larger counties and offers a path for local governments that want to manage provider selection.
Next steps: The bill is to be transmitted to the House for its consideration; local governments and interested providers will need to use the new RFP process and state certification if they adopt this path.
