Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surveyor Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel and floor debate a proposed surveyor licensing overhaul (SB 92)
Summary
Lawmakers debated a first-substitute to SB 92 that would require an associate degree (or equivalent) and reduce apprenticeship time, with grandfathering through Feb. 2007. Supporters said the change sets a minimum professional standard; opponents pressed for clearer UCAT/technical-college language and raised access and reciprocity concerns.
A first-substitute to Senate Bill 92, proposing new minimum education and experience standards for professional land surveyors, consumed a substantial portion of floor debate Jan. 23.
Sponsor Senator Stevenson said the change addresses persistent surveying errors and sets "a minimal standard" by requiring a two-year degree or equivalent land surveying program combined with reduced experience requirements and a grandfather window for current apprentices. He told colleagues some neighboring states have higher standards and that Utah’s existing rules have allowed lower thresholds.
Opponents and questioners raised several practical concerns. Senator Hickman said requiring an associate degree could force rural residents to relocate to Salt Lake to complete required coursework, unless UCAT and technical colleges offer equivalent programs; he urged reliance on UCAT specialties and technical-school delivery where feasible. Senator Knudson and others argued the legislation moves the profession in the right direction but stressed standards must be framed to avoid unintended legal interpretations. Senator Evans asked for explicit clarifications so the UCAT pathway would be acceptable and not leave the language ambiguous.
Stevenson and colleagues agreed to prepare clarifying amendments for the next day’s session. The bill’s floor progression included a recorded vote: first substitute SB 92 passed to the third-reading calendar with 25 aye votes, 2 nay votes and 2 absences.
Direct floor quotes illustrate the tenor of debate. Senator Stevenson said, "This 2 year degree is a minimal standard, And it is supported by I don't know of any opposition to it from the surveying community" (floor discussion). Senator Allen emphasized the problem the bill seeks to address: "it might not be a bad idea if they read Dante's Inferno so they could find out the hell they create when they mislead your property by 17 feet." Other senators pressed for precise language about which education programs would qualify and how grandfathering would operate.
Sponsor commitments and floor-recorded outcomes: senators agreed to file an amendment to clarify that UCAT (technical college) programs or equivalent land surveying programs would qualify under the degree-equivalency language. The bill moves to a third-reading vote after the sponsor and Senator Evans prepare clarifying language.
Next steps: sponsors planned to file the UCAT-equivalency clarification for third reading; the final form of SB 92 will determine the practical availability of licensure pathways across the state and how out-of-state experience is evaluated.
