Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Operating Under Influence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances lower BAC threshold for second OUI offenses with children after contentious debate
Summary
On March 2, 2004 the Utah Senate passed an amendment to operating-under-the-influence law moving the blood-alcohol threshold for a second offense involving children in the vehicle from 0.08 to 0.05. Supporters cited scientific studies and broad stakeholder backing; opponents warned the change would penalize moderate drinkers and produce unintended license revocations.
On March 2, 2004, the Utah State Senate passed an amendment to operating-under-the-influence provisions that lowers the blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) threshold for a second OUI offense involving children in the vehicle from 0.08 to 0.05.
Senator Michael Waddup, presenting the House amendments, said the change responded to research and stakeholder input: "This is the bill that, reduces the blood alcohol level for a drunk driver on a second offense that has children in the vehicle from 0.08 to 0.05." He pointed to studies and a list of supporting organizations, including law enforcement and medical groups.
Supporters urged the Senate that the lower threshold would better capture impairment on the road and enhance protection for children. The sponsor framed the amendment as a measured, evidence-based refinement and accompanied it with intent language clarifying the bill's scope.
Opponents raised procedural and policy concerns. Senator Allen said the measure risked serious penalties for people who had a distant prior DUI and a single evening lapse, arguing: "This would create a scenario in which someone who has a DUI when they're 21 years old could later, 10, 20 years later, fall off the wagon for 1 evening, happen to have someone in the car with them and be treated entirely, even if it's 0.05, as a second offense, which as you know is a revocation of your driver's license and very serious fines." He voted against the amendment.
Senator Hickman was also emphatic in opposition, telling colleagues: "The simple fact is, you are not drunk. I don't care what the studies show." He and other critics argued the measure criminalizes conduct by drivers who have consumed only modest amounts of alcohol and questioned whether the change would focus enforcement on the most dangerous drivers.
After debate and a roll-call, the Senate recorded the measure as passed with 17 aye votes and 9 no votes (3 absent); Senator Arendt later asked to change her vote to aye, updating the official tally to 18 aye, 9 no, 2 absent. The Senate recorded the bill as amended and referred it back to the House for further consideration.
The Senate's action follows a sequence of committee and floor amendments and reflects a broader national discussion about impairment thresholds. The bill’s next procedural step is further action in the House as the chambers reconcile amendments and final language.
