Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Internet Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances library filtering bill after delay amendment fails

Utah State Senate · March 2, 2004
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate advanced House Bill 341, the Children’s Internet Protection Act, to the third-reading calendar on March 2 after rejecting an amendment to delay the law’s implementation. The bill would require public libraries receiving state funds to implement filtering measures; senators debated costs and timing.

The Utah Senate on March 2 voted to advance House Bill 341, the Children’s Internet Protection Act, to the third-reading calendar after defeating an amendment that would have delayed its effective date.

Senator Hatch, sponsor on the floor, said the bill aims to require public libraries that receive state funds to implement and enforce filtering measures that block access to certain images and content. “This is an important issue,” Hatch said, citing statistics he placed before the body that showed early exposure among children: “the average age of first exposure to internet *********** is 11 years old.”

An amendment offered by Senator Hale would have delayed the bill’s effective date until Nov. 30, 2004, to give libraries time to implement the required technology. Senators raising budgetary concerns noted the cost of compliance for large libraries could be substantial. Senator Hale said estimates put the Salt Lake City Public Library’s compliance cost “at $150,000,” while other figures cited by senators put similar costs as high as $200,000.

Opponents of the delay argued the state has a responsibility to move quickly to protect children. Senator Stevenson, who opposed the amendment, said librarians had repeatedly failed to implement adequate safeguards and that the law needed “teeth.” Supporters of the amendment, including Senator Aaron, said libraries might need extra time to procure equipment through requests for proposals or to secure federal grants.

The chamber put the amendment to a vote; the amendment failed after senators recorded 15 "no" votes. The main bill was then read for third consideration. The Senate reported the vote tally as 23 yeas, 2 nays, and 4 absent and moved HB 341 to the third-reading calendar.

The bill references the federal Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) and includes language intended to align state funding requirements with permissible federal practice. If passed by the full Legislature and signed by the governor, HB 341 would condition state library funds on libraries’ implementation and enforcement of filtering measures described in the bill.

Next steps: HB 341 will return for third-reading consideration on the Senate calendar. The fiscal impacts and implementation plans raised on the floor indicate libraries and local governments may seek clarifications or technical assistance before the bill reaches final passage.