Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecommunications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances narrow telecom limits on municipal networks after extended debate
Summary
Senate Bill 66, which would limit municipal wholesale telecommunications projects (known as Utopia) by requiring bond repayment from project revenues, barring cross-subsidies from tax dollars, and prohibiting municipal preference of specific providers, advanced to third reading after prolonged floor debate about fiscal risk and local control.
Senator Hickman presented Senate Bill 66 as a targeted measure to clarify municipal authority and protect taxpayers when cities pursue wholesale telecommunications projects similar to the Utopia plan. "SB 66 simply requires three things," he told the Senate: that bonds issued for telecommunications facilities be repaid solely from project revenues, that municipalities not cross-subsidize services with tax dollars, and that cities must treat private providers nondiscriminatorily.
The presentation prompted sustained questioning and debate. Senator Thomas said municipalities that act like utilities change the competitive landscape and warned that once a utility has franchise advantages, it is costly for competitors to enter. He asked whether cities that received inadequate private investment had an obligation to act on behalf of their residents.
Senator Hickman and proponents argued the bill is narrow and intended to prevent taxpayer exposure for risky projects and to preserve a level playing field for private providers. Opponents and some city representatives said the bill could limit local governments’ ability to use general obligation bonds or other financing tools (including voter-approved GO bonds) to pursue broadband projects, and that it may effectively prohibit some municipal plans.
Senators also raised questions about the use of sales-tax revenues as a backstop for bonds and about the availability of substitute language to allow GO-bond financing with voter approval. The Senate voted to read SB 66 for the third time and advanced it to the third-reading calendar, leaving open the possibility of substitute language to address GO-bond and financing concerns in later debate.
