Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves tourism-funding package after restaurant-tax amendment fails
Summary
Senate debate over SB208 centered on a proposed restaurant-related tax that opponents said would be critical to the bill’s projected revenue; the amendment to remove restaurants failed and SB208 passed 16–10 on Feb. 25, 2004.
Get email alerts on the Tourism Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Bill 208, a proposed funding package to promote tourism and related economic development, passed the Utah Senate on Feb. 25, 2004 after debate over an amendment that would have removed restaurants from the proposed tax base.
Sponsor Senator Knudson described SB208 as a mechanism that would generate revenue (sponsors cited potential revenue near $120 million annually to the general fund from several measures) and boost economic development and marketing. He told colleagues that roughly $14 million annually would likely come from the restaurant-related portion of the proposed levy and argued that removing restaurants would undercut the funding plan and essentially kill the bill.
Senator Stevenson offered an amendment to exclude restaurant receipts from the tax. He argued restaurants mostly sell to Utah residents and therefore should not shoulder a disproportionate share of a tourism-marketing tax targeted at out-of-state visitors. Senator Knudson and other supporters said the funding model depends on the mix of revenue sources and that Colorado and neighboring states already invest significantly in tourism promotion.
The amendment to remove restaurants failed on a voice vote; the Senate then proceeded to a roll-call vote on SB208, which passed 16–10 with 3 senators absent. The bill will be referred to the House for further consideration and possible concurrence on any floor amendments.
Floor debate highlighted the tension between broad-based revenue mechanisms and targeted tax incidence. Proponents emphasized the need for sustained investments in tourism promotion to remain competitive; critics cautioned about local economic impacts and fairness of tax incidence on businesses whose customers are primarily in-state.
Next steps: SB208 is to be transmitted to the House. If the House takes different actions on the funding mix, further conference or amendment work may follow.
