Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Tax And Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances tourism-funding plan and county option tax after debate over restaurants and representation
Summary
Senate moved second-substitute SB60 (county opt-in sports/tourism tax) and SB208 (state tourism funding and board restructuring) toward third reading after amendments on start dates, regional representation and spending limits; supporters said the changes would target tourism promotion and could raise significant revenue, while opponents warned of hidden taxes on local restaurants.
The Utah Senate debated and advanced two related tourism measures on Feb. 24: Second Substitute Senate Bill 60, which enables counties to adopt a permissive tax for sports development, tourism, recreation, cultural and convention facilities, and Senate Bill 208, which restructures state tourism funding and the tourism board.
Senator Waddups, sponsor of the county-option measure, moved an amendment to delay the earliest implementation date to Jan. 1, 2005 so counties could align the change with their budget processes. The Senate adopted that amendment.
Senator Knudson and others presented SB208, which would create a dedicated tourism economic stimulus fund, allocate a portion of new lodging and restaurant tax revenue to statewide advertising and create a new board structure appointed as the bill prescribes. Sponsors estimated initial revenue of roughly $14 million for the coming fiscal year and suggested potential growth to as much as $120 million annually. The bill directs a portion of collections to statewide advertising and creates carve-outs for sports-event promotion and local sports authorities.
Several members raised concerns about the restaurant portion of the proposal and the distribution of benefits to small, local restaurants. "Tourism is a fraction of my business," said Senator Bell (speaking of a small restaurant owner's testimony), and other senators warned that a restaurant tax could predominantly be paid by local residents in some counties. Supporters responded that the bill improves accountability and targeting of tourism dollars and that local elected county bodies would implement any tax and be answerable to voters.
After debate and floor amendments restoring certain regional representation provisions and clarifying how funds may be used, the Senate voted to pass Second Substitute SB60 to third reading (tally reported 19 aye, 8 no, 2 absent) and passed SB208 to third reading (reported 19 aye, 7 no, 3 absent).
Next steps: Both measures proceed to third-reading calendar; county officials and local business groups (restaurants and hotels) were highlighted as principal stakeholders to monitor.
