Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governmental Immunity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances overhaul of Utah Governmental Immunity Act after floor debate
Summary
First substitute Senate Bill 55, a comprehensive rewrite of Utah's Governmental Immunity Act intended to clarify liability rules and preserve notice procedures, passed the Senate second-reading roll call and moves to third reading after debate over caps, plaintiffs' notice and whether municipal enterprises should face private-sector liability.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 24 advanced First Substitute Senate Bill 55, a comprehensive rewrite of the Governmental Immunity Act intended to modernize notice and discovery rules, consolidate immunity provisions and set liability caps.
Sponsor Senator Blackham said the measure was the product of a task force of about 27 lawyers representing a range of stakeholders and would "codify the discovery rules to preserve the claims for injured parties" while establishing safe-harbor notice procedures and consolidating immunity law in one place. He told senators the bill preserves legislature's intent to apply governmental immunity broadly to governmental functions while clarifying definitions that courts have left unsettled.
The bill also preserves statutory liability caps; the sponsor cited a per-person cap of $553,500. Supporters urged that the measure makes the claims process fairer and easier to navigate, reducing dismissals that have arisen from procedural technicalities under the older statute.
Opponents warned the measure could shield municipal enterprises. "If government is going to be in the business of business, they should have the same accountability for damage they have done to citizens as their private-sector counterparts," said Senator Stevenson, who announced opposition on principle and raised the prospect that municipal utilities could be treated like private companies under prior court rulings. Other senators said the bill was written with an eye toward addressing a recent Supreme Court decision (referred to on the floor as the Laney/Fairview decision) and intended to give clearer statutory guidance to both governments and courts.
After floor debate and a short procedural call to ensure a quorum, senators voted to read SB55 for a third time; the clerk reported the tally as 25 aye, 3 nay, 1 absent. The bill now moves to third reading for final consideration in the Senate.
The sponsor said staff and task-force members were available to answer technical questions as the bill proceeds to the next stage.
Next steps: SB55 is scheduled for third-reading consideration; senators said they expected further technical briefing and the sponsor indicated additional materials would be provided to members.
