Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensing And Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes licensing and oversight changes for certain residential programs after lengthy floor debate
Summary
Second Substitute S.B. 140, establishing licensing rules for boarding-school-style treatment programs and restricting firearms in some foster homes, passed the Senate after extended debate over definitions and scope. Senators raised concerns over broad terms like "treatment" and whether private property could be unintentionally covered.
The Utah Senate passed Second Substitute Senate Bill 140 on Feb. 11, 2004, after extended floor debate and two amendments that clarified firearms access in certain foster homes and added a definition for "boarding school" that focuses on 24-hour residential treatment programs for four or more unrelated individuals.
Senator Butters placed two amendments: one restricting firearms access in foster homes that house children from the Division of Youth Services or youth corrections populations and one that defined "boarding school" to mean a 24-hour residential setting that provides room, board, education and treatment or behavior modification. The firearms amendment included a clerical correction—changing a misspelled reference from "female weapons" to "firearms"—which the Senate adopted.
Debate on the boarding-school definition occupied much of the floor time. Senator Hatch warned that broad terms such as "treatment" or "discipline" could unintentionally sweep in private recreational ranches or short-term camps: "...if 1 of them gets out of line, gets running out through the cattle or the sheep or tries to get on a horse that they shouldn't be on, would my advising them not to do so, or would that be considered discipline?" he asked, pressing on whether common recreational activities might be regulated.
Senator Hickman and others urged narrowing the language, suggesting terms such as "clinical behavior modification" to focus on programs with trained professionals. The sponsor and the Department of Licensing's director (Ken Stetler, introduced during debate) said the department did not intend to bring under licensing those programs that do not charge for services; the sponsor indicated many programs already operate under the department's oversight and estimated that only "3, maybe 4" additional facilities statewide would newly fall under the requirement. The Department of Licensing told senators that any additional inspection or oversight costs could be handled within existing budgets, according to the floor explanation.
After debate and amendment votes (the Senate struck the word "discipline" from the amendment and retained an amended boarding-school definition), the Senate voted to pass the second substitute. The clerk announced that Second Substitute S.B. 140 received 19 ayes, 9 no votes, and 1 absent and will be sent to the House for further consideration.
Proponents argued the bill brings into oversight programs that provide therapeutic or treatment services to at-risk youth and extends protections for child safety and welfare. Critics warned the statutory language remained broad and risked applying to private-property gatherings and nonclinical programs unless the bill is further narrowed in the House.
Next steps: The House will consider the Senate-passed second substitute; sponsors signaled openness to refine definitions and limits to reduce unintended applications.
